Practitioner Track · Module 8
The GenAI Platform: Reusable Components & Patterns
Learn how to leverage reusable GenAI components—prompt libraries, RAG infrastructure, and LLM gateways—to accelerate delivery and scale GenAI across the enterprise.
- Understand the 'GenAI platform' concept: reusable prompts, knowledge bases, and infrastructure
- Learn key components: prompt libraries, vector stores, LLM gateways, evaluation frameworks
- Know how using common components accelerates scaling and ensures consistency
- Identify what reusable GenAI assets your organization has (or should have)
The GenAI Platform Concept
Organizations that scale GenAI successfully don't rebuild from scratch for each use case. They invest in reusable components that accelerate every subsequent project.
McKinsey's GenAI research finds that 31% of high performers have adopted a modular component approach—compared to only 11% of others. This is a key differentiator. Meanwhile, many companies get stuck doing one-off pilots because they lack platform thinking.
From One-Off to Scalable
| One-Off Approach | Platform Approach |
|---|---|
| Each team picks their own LLM and builds custom integrations | Centralized LLM gateway with approved models and consistent APIs |
| Prompts are stored in individual documents or code | Shared prompt library with tested, versioned prompts |
| Every RAG project builds its own vector store | Shared knowledge infrastructure teams can plug into |
| No visibility into what's working | Evaluation frameworks measure quality across use cases |
Workplace Scenario: The Support Assistant
Your business unit wants to deploy a GenAI assistant to help customer support agents find answers faster. You're about to start building from scratch when a colleague mentions that the central platform team maintains some reusable assets.
You discover:
- A prompt library with tested customer service prompts (tone, escalation handling, response templates)
- A knowledge base infrastructure already connected to product documentation and FAQs
- An LLM gateway that handles authentication, rate limiting, and cost tracking
- An evaluation framework to measure response quality and hallucination rates
Instead of 2 months of work, you can:
- Use existing prompts as your starting point
- Connect to the shared knowledge base (or add your team's content)
- Route requests through the LLM gateway
- Measure quality using established evaluation patterns
Result: Proof of concept in 2 weeks. Consistent quality. Visible costs. Built-in guardrails.
This is the power of the GenAI platform.
Key Platform Components
1. Prompt Library
What it is: A centralized repository of tested, versioned prompts that teams can reuse and adapt.
Benefits:
- Don't reinvent prompts for common tasks
- Consistent quality and tone across the organization
- Learn from what works (and what doesn't)
- Version control for prompt iterations
Example Prompts:
| Prompt Name | Purpose | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
customer_response_professional_v3 | Draft customer service replies | Empathetic tone, escalation triggers, brand voice |
summarize_meeting_notes_v2 | Condense meeting transcripts | Action items extraction, attendee attribution |
extract_contract_entities_v1 | Parse legal documents | Structured output, defined entity types |
code_review_feedback_v2 | Review pull requests | Constructive tone, specific suggestions |
What makes a prompt library valuable:
- Clear naming conventions
- Documentation of when to use each prompt
- Version history with change notes
- Performance metrics (if available)
2. Knowledge Base Infrastructure (RAG)
What it is: Shared infrastructure for connecting GenAI to your organization's information—vector stores, embedding pipelines, and retrieval systems.
Benefits:
- Teams don't each build their own RAG pipeline
- Consistent chunking and embedding strategies
- Centralized content updates flow to all applications
- Shared investment in retrieval quality
Components:
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Vector Store | Stores embeddings for semantic search (Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector) |
| Embedding Pipeline | Converts documents to vectors consistently |
| Content Connectors | Sync from Confluence, SharePoint, Google Drive, etc. |
| Retrieval API | Standardized interface for "find relevant context" |
Example: Instead of each team figuring out how to embed and search company documents, they call a central retrieval API: "Give me the 5 most relevant chunks for this query from the product-docs collection."
3. LLM Gateway
What it is: A centralized layer that sits between your applications and LLM providers, handling cross-cutting concerns.
Benefits:
- Single place to manage API keys and access
- Cost tracking and budget controls per team/project
- Rate limiting and retry logic
- Easy model switching (swap GPT-5.x for Claude without code changes)
- Consistent logging and audit trails
What it handles:
| Concern | Without Gateway | With Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| API keys | Scattered across apps | Centralized, rotated securely |
| Costs | No visibility | Per-team dashboards |
| Model selection | Hardcoded | Configuration-driven |
| Failures | Each app handles differently | Consistent retry/fallback |
| Logging | Inconsistent or missing | Unified audit trail |
4. Evaluation Framework
What it is: Tools and processes for measuring GenAI output quality consistently across use cases.
Benefits:
- Know if your prompts are working before production
- Detect quality degradation over time
- Compare different approaches objectively
- Build confidence for stakeholders
Evaluation Approaches:
| Type | What It Measures | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Automated metrics | Similarity scores, format compliance, keyword presence | Continuous monitoring |
| LLM-as-judge | Another LLM rates output quality against criteria | Scalable quality assessment |
| Human evaluation | Expert review of samples | High-stakes validation |
| A/B testing | User preference between versions | Production optimization |
Example Metrics:
- Hallucination rate (% of responses with unsupported claims)
- Relevance score (does the response address the question?)
- Format compliance (does output match expected structure?)
- Tone alignment (does it match brand voice?)
Knowledge Check
Test your understanding with a quick quiz
Matching Exercise: Components and Benefits
Match each platform component to its primary benefit:
Connect each platform component on the left to its primary benefit on the right. Click an item, then click its match.
How Components Accelerate Delivery
Data Flow Through the GenAI Platform
01User Query02 ↓03LLM Gateway (auth, routing, logging)04 ↓05Prompt Library (select/customize prompt)06 ↓07Knowledge Base (retrieve relevant context)08 ↓09LLM API (generate response)10 ↓11Evaluation (log quality metrics)12 ↓13Response to User
Each layer builds on the ones below. When you start a new project, you're not starting from zero—you're building on a foundation.
Time Savings by Component
| Without Platform | With Platform | Savings |
|---|---|---|
| 2 weeks: prompt development & testing | 2 days (adapt from library) | 8 days |
| 3 weeks: RAG pipeline setup | 3 days (connect to existing) | 12 days |
| 1 week: LLM integration & auth | 1 day (use gateway) | 4 days |
| 2 weeks: quality testing | 3 days (use eval framework) | 7 days |
| 8 weeks total | ~2 weeks total | 6 weeks |
Building vs. Buying Platform Components
Not every organization needs to build everything in-house. Consider:
| Component | Build When... | Buy/Use When... |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt Library | You have unique domain needs | Starting out; use team wikis + version control |
| Vector Store | Scale or security requires it | Most cases; managed services work well |
| LLM Gateway | Complex multi-model routing needed | Simpler needs; provider SDKs may suffice |
| Evaluation | Custom quality criteria | Standard metrics; open-source tools exist |
Emerging tools: Platforms like LangChain, LlamaIndex, Weights & Biases, and Humanloop provide building blocks. Cloud providers offer managed vector stores and model endpoints. The "build vs. buy" decision depends on your scale, security requirements, and internal capabilities.
Group Reflection: What Could Be Reused?
Think about a GenAI project your team has built or is building:
Questions to consider:
- Did you develop prompts that work well and could be shared?
- Is there knowledge base content that other teams might need?
- Did you solve an integration challenge others will face?
- What would you have wanted to exist when you started?
The contribution mindset: Champions don't just consume platform components—they contribute back. A successful prompt, a useful retrieval pattern, a quality evaluation rubric—these become organizational assets.
Completion: Component Selection
Scenario: You need to build a GenAI assistant that helps sales reps prepare for customer calls by summarizing account history and suggesting talking points.
Available Enterprise Components:
- Prompt library – includes
summarize_customer_history_v2andgenerate_talking_points_v1 - CRM knowledge connector – syncs Salesforce data to the vector store nightly
- LLM gateway – provides access to GPT-4 and Claude with per-team cost tracking
- Evaluation framework – includes relevance scoring and hallucination detection
Quiz: How would you approach this? Which components would you use?
Recommended Approach:
- Start with the prompt library—adapt existing prompts for your specific sales context
- Connect to the CRM knowledge connector to pull account history
- Route through the LLM gateway for consistent access and cost visibility
- Use the evaluation framework to test output quality before launch
Reflection Exercise
Apply what you've learned with a written response
Your Contribution Plan
Exercise: Identify one way you could contribute to your organization's GenAI platform.
Consider:
- A prompt that works well and should be documented
- Knowledge base content your team owns that others need
- An integration pattern that could be generalized
- An evaluation approach that proved useful
Examples:
- "Our customer objection handling prompt should be in the prompt library"
- "We should add our product FAQ content to the shared knowledge base"
- "Our approach to measuring response tone could become a standard metric"
Practical Exercise
Complete an artifact to demonstrate your skills
Key Takeaways
- The GenAI platform approach industrializes delivery through reusable components
- Key components: prompt libraries, knowledge base infrastructure, LLM gateways, evaluation frameworks
- 31% of AI high performers use modular components vs. only 11% of others—this is a differentiator
- Champions both consume and contribute to platform assets
- Starting with existing components can reduce time-to-value by 75% or more
Congratulations!
You've completed the Practitioner Track foundation modules. You now understand:
- Strategy: Connecting GenAI to business value (Module 1)
- Prioritization: Assessing readiness and ranking opportunities (Module 2)
- Ethics: Responsible AI principles and practices (Module 3)
- Governance: Documentation, escalation, and oversight (Module 4)
- Operating Models: How to work within centralized, federated, or hybrid structures (Module 5)
- Platforms: Leveraging reusable components to scale (Module 6)
What's Next?
Continue to Data Literacy for GenAI and Prompt Engineering modules, or explore the Trainer Track to learn how to facilitate AI learning for others and build communities of practice.
Your journey as an AI Champion continues!